Case Studies
All our Partners have over fifteen years’ experience in employment law. The people, situations and complexities we have met and handled require the best in professional, experienced and friendly support.
See below for a small collection of case studies from our team portfolio of work.
A story of constructive dismissal
When a Black British finance professional raised valid concerns over his employers conduct, his life was made unbearable at work, forcing him to resign. Bloomsbury Square Employment Law partner, Will Burrows worked with them to get the best possible result.
A story of performance management
When a senior finance executive received a letter from his employer stating performance and conduct concerns, and a draft settlement agreement, Bloomsbury Square partner, Garvey Hanchard, ensured that their rights were upheld and they got the best possible deal.
A Tribunal proceedings case study
When a professional woman raised concerns over sudden changes in her new role, she was informed she had failed probation. Nicola Welchman ensured her rights were upheld and she got fair treatment.
Other news and insights
Bloomsbury Square Employment Law recognised in Legal 500 and Chambers 2027
Bloomsbury Square Employment Law is celebrating its continued recognition in both Chambers and Partners and The Legal 500, the UK’s leading legal directories, for its work supporting senior professionals on a range of employment matters.
Autism and employment: understanding your rights
“Only three in 10 autistic people are in work, the lowest of any disability”. This statement from the National Autistic Society is shocking to me both as a mum to an autistic young man and as an employment lawyer.
Why the £118000 compensation cap for unfair dismissal must be lifted
The statutory cap on unfair dismissal compensation, currently set at £118,223 or one year’s salary (whichever is lower), often fails to deliver justice for high earners. In most areas of law, damages reflect actual loss. Yet senior executives face an arbitrary ceiling on redress, regardless of how egregious the dismissal or how significant the financial impact.